RE: Partial aggregates pushdown

From: "Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp" <Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, "Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp" <Fujii(dot)Yuki(at)df(dot)MitsubishiElectric(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: RE: Partial aggregates pushdown
Date: 2023-10-27 02:44:42
Message-ID: TYTPR01MB10954B4C9A791FA9D2BF692F095DCA@TYTPR01MB10954.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Momjian.

Thank you for your improvement.
As a matter of detail, I think that the areas marked below are erroneous.

--
+ Pushdown causes aggregate function cals to send partial aggregate
^
+ function calls to the remote server. If the partial aggregate
+ function doesn't doesn't exist on the remote server, it causes
^^^^^^^
--

> What else needs to be done before committers start to review
> this?
There are no others. May I make a new version of v31 with your
suggested improvements for the committer's review?

Sincerely yours,
Yuuki Fujii

--
Yuuki Fujii
Information Technology R&D Center Mitsubishi Electric Corporation

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-10-27 02:57:59 A recent message added to pg_upgade
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2023-10-27 02:36:36 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node