RE: sequencesync worker race with REFRESH SEQUENCES

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'vignesh C' <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: RE: sequencesync worker race with REFRESH SEQUENCES
Date: 2026-07-24 13:31:35
Message-ID: TYRPR01MB12156B06216E253AB7A4E1976F5CF2@TYRPR01MB12156.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Vignesh,

> Yes it is better to keep sequence synchronization worker also similar.
> The attached v2 version has the changes to call
> maybe_reread_subscription and identify if the subscription is
> disabled.

Thanks for updating the patch. LGTM.

Best regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Aya Iwata (Fujitsu) 2026-07-24 13:32:05 Re: Fix race in background worker termination for database
Previous Message Shlok Kyal 2026-07-24 13:28:40 Re: [Bug] pg_upgrade could fail for non-superuser subscriptions using foreign servers