RE: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format

From: "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Melih Mutlu' <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Allow logical replication to copy tables in binary format
Date: 2023-02-16 05:16:51
Message-ID: TYCPR01MB837368B98CDA0625020406EBEDA09@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi, Melih

On Monday, January 30, 2023 7:50 PM Melih Mutlu <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing.
...
> Well, with this patch, it will begin to fail in the table copy phase...
The latest patch doesn't get updated for more than two weeks
after some review comments. If you don't have time,
I would like to help updating the patch for you and other reviewers.

Kindly let me know your status.

Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2023-02-16 05:21:01 Re: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2023-02-16 05:08:42 Re: Force testing of query jumbling code in TAP tests