RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)

From: "Takamichi Osumi (Fujitsu)" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Peter Smith' <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com" <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com" <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "euler(at)eulerto(dot)com" <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, "m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com" <m(dot)melihmutlu(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br" <marcos(at)f10(dot)com(dot)br>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Time delayed LR (WAS Re: logical replication restrictions)
Date: 2023-01-19 08:16:11
Message-ID: TYCPR01MB837334F4E55DA5ACCA5E128AEDC49@TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday, January 19, 2023 10:42 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 6:06 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Here are my review comments for the latest patch v16-0001. (excluding
> > the test code)
> >
> ...
> >
> > 8. AlterSubscription (general)
> >
> > I observed during testing there are 3 different errors….
> >
> > At subscription CREATE time you can get this error:
> > ERROR: min_apply_delay > 0 and streaming = parallel are mutually
> > exclusive options
> >
> > If you try to ALTER the min_apply_delay when already streaming =
> > parallel you can get this error:
> > ERROR: cannot enable min_apply_delay for subscription in streaming =
> > parallel mode
> >
> > If you try to ALTER the streaming to be parallel if there is already a
> > min_apply_delay > 0 then you can get this error:
> > ERROR: cannot enable streaming = parallel mode for subscription with
> > min_apply_delay
> >
> > ~
> >
> > IMO there is no need to have 3 different error message texts. I think
> > all these cases are explained by just the first text (ERROR:
> > min_apply_delay > 0 and streaming = parallel are mutually exclusive
> > options)
> >
> >
>
> After checking the regression test output I can see the merit of your separate
> error messages like this, even if they are maybe not strictly necessary. So feel
> free to ignore my previous review comment.
Thank you for your notification.

I wrote another reason why we wrote those messages in [1].
So, please have a look at it.

[1] - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/TYCPR01MB8373447440202B248BB63805EDC49%40TYCPR01MB8373.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com

Best Regards,
Takamichi Osumi

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2023-01-19 08:37:47 RE: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication
Previous Message Drouvot, Bertrand 2023-01-19 08:13:22 Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys