RE: speed up a logical replica setup

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>
Subject: RE: speed up a logical replica setup
Date: 2024-03-25 09:16:42
Message-ID: TYCPR01MB12077D2292716B6CD4E95B2ABF5362@TYCPR01MB12077.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> IIUC, added options were inspired by Tomas. And he said the limitation
> (pub/sub/slot
> name cannot be specified) was acceptable for the first version. I agree with him.
> (To be honest, I feel that options should be fewer for the first release)

Just to confirm - I don't think it is not completely needed. If we can agree a specification
in sometime, it's OK for me to add them. If you ask me, I still prefer Tomas's approach.

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
https://www.fujitsu.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2024-03-25 09:16:50 Re: Memory consumed by child SpecialJoinInfo in partitionwise join planning
Previous Message shveta malik 2024-03-25 09:09:50 Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation