RE: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup

From: "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'vignesh C' <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup
Date: 2022-03-07 07:37:46
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB5866F8C2C2C8C5C6F990EB97F5089@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Vignesh,

> I felt changing only_local option might be useful for the user while
> modifying the subscription like setting it with a different set of
> publications. Changes for this are included in the v2 patch attached
> at [1].

+1, thanks. I'll post if I notice something to say.

> Shall we get a few opinions on this and take it in that direction?

I prefer subscriber-option, but I also think both are reasonable.
+1 about asking other reviewers.

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gilles Darold 2022-03-07 07:38:04 Re: [Proposal] vacuumdb --schema only
Previous Message vignesh C 2022-03-07 07:17:43 Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup