RE: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication

From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Amit Kapila' <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication
Date: 2022-12-28 02:49:53
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB58669CB06F6657ABCEFE6555F5F29@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dear Amit,

> In logical replication, it can happen today as well without
> time-delayed replication. Basically, say apply worker is waiting to
> acquire some lock that is already acquired by some backend then it
> will have the same behavior. I have not verified this, so you may want
> to check it once.

Right, I could reproduce the scenario with following steps.

1. Construct pub -> sub logical replication system with streaming = off.
2. Define a table on both nodes.

```
CREATE TABLE tbl (id int PRIMARY KEY);
```

3. Execute concurrent transactions.

Tx-1 (on subscriber)
BEGIN;
INSERT INTO tbl SELECT i FROM generate_series(1, 5000) s(i);

Tx-2 (on publisher)
INSERT INTO tbl SELECT i FROM generate_series(1, 5000) s(i);

4. Try to shutdown publisher but it will be failed.

```
$ pg_ctl stop -D publisher
waiting for server to shut down............................................................... failed
pg_ctl: server does not shut down
```

Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-12-28 03:56:29 Re: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2022-12-28 02:47:56 RE: Exit walsender before confirming remote flush in logical replication