From: | "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabrice Chapuis <fabrice636861(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: Logical replication timeout problem |
Date: | 2022-03-28 01:55:40 |
Message-ID: | TYAPR01MB586636517DED745651D6E75AF51D9@TYAPR01MB5866.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Wang-san,
Thank you for updating!
...but it also cannot be applied to current HEAD
because of the commit 923def9a533.
Your patch seems to conflict the adding an argument of logicalrep_write_insert().
It allows specifying columns to publish by skipping some columns in logicalrep_write_tuple()
which is called from logicalrep_write_insert() and logicalrep_write_update().
Do we have to consider something special case for that?
I thought timeout may occur if users have huge table and publish few columns,
but it is corner case.
Best Regards,
Hayato Kuroda
FUJITSU LIMITED
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Yugo NAGATA | 2022-03-28 02:29:36 | Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2022-03-28 01:34:44 | Re: standby recovery fails (tablespace related) (tentative patch and discussion) |