From: | "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | 'Kyotaro Horiguchi' <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org" <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | "iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: libpq debug log |
Date: | 2021-03-29 06:15:16 |
Message-ID: | TYAPR01MB2990DB9EB00899755F339CF0FE7E9@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
From: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>
> It's better to be short as far as it is clear enough. Actually '<' to
> 'F' and '>' to 'B' is clear enough to me. So I don't need a longer
> notation.
Agreed, because the message format description in the PG manual uses F and B.
Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | tsunakawa.takay@fujitsu.com | 2021-03-29 06:21:09 | RE: libpq debug log |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2021-03-29 06:12:43 | Re: [PATCH] Provide more information to filter_prepare |