RE: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list

From: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: 'Fujii Masao' <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: Inconsistent Japanese name order in v13 contributors list
Date: 2020-09-09 05:58:10
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB2990D1CDC603D78F6DBA6CEEFE260@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>
> On 2020/09/09 14:15, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> > Attached is a patch to standardize Japanese names as given-name-first
> > in the v13 contributors list as before.
>
> Using given-name-first order is our consensus? I was thinking we have not
> reached that yet and our "vague" consensus was to use the name that each
> contributor prefers, for example the name that used in the email signature, etc.
>
> BTW, if possible I'd like to use family-name-first, i.e., "Fujii Masao".

According to the following article, first name -> given name order is usually used even for Western personal names? I don't mind either way. What I hope is to not burdon people who author the release note page.

Personal name - Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_name

"Western name order"

"Within alphabetic lists and catalogs, however, the family name is generally put first, with the given name(s) following, separated from it by a comma (e.g. Smith, John), representing the "lexical name order". This convention is followed by most Western libraries, as well as on many administrative forms."

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2020-09-09 06:16:13 Re: [PATCH] Detect escape of ErrorContextCallback stack pointers (and from PG_TRY() )
Previous Message Yugo NAGATA 2020-09-09 05:49:24 Re: Implementing Incremental View Maintenance