RE: libpq debug log

From: "tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
To: "iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <iwata(dot)aya(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <k(dot)jamison(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Alvaro Herrera' <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "'pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org'" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: RE: libpq debug log
Date: 2021-02-03 01:26:41
Message-ID: TYAPR01MB2990511185A563A32FB08DFCFEB49@TYAPR01MB2990.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

(39)
+ of tracing. If (<literal>flags</literal> &amp; <literal>PQTRACE_OUTPUT_TIMESTAMPS</literal>) is
+ true, then timestamp is not printed with each message.

The flag name (OUTPUT) and its description (not printed) doesn't match.

I think you can use less programmatical expression like "If <literal>flags</literal> contains <literal>PQTRACE_OUTPUT_TIMESTAMPS</literal>".

(40)
diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/exports.txt b/src/interfaces/libpq/exports.txt
+PQtraceEx 180
\ No newline at end of file

What's the second line? Isn't the file missing an empty line at the end?

(41)
+void
+PQtraceEx(PGconn *conn, FILE *debug_port, int flags)
+{
+ if (conn == NULL)
+ return;
...
+ if (!debug_port)
+ return;

The if should better be as follows to match the style of existing surrounding code.

+ if (debug_port == NULL)

(42)
+pqLogFormatTimestamp(char *timestr, Size ts_len)

I think you should use int or size_t instead of Size here, because other libpq code uses them. int should be enough. If the compiler gives warnings, prepend "(int)" before sizeof() at call sites.

(43)
+ /* append microseconds */
+ sprintf(timestr + strlen(timestr), ".%06d", (int) (tval.tv_usec / 1000));

"/ 1000" should be removed.

(44)
+ if ((conn->traceFlags & PQTRACE_OUTPUT_TIMESTAMPS) == 0)
+ timestr_p = pqLogFormatTimestamp(timestr, sizeof(timestr));

== 0 should be removed.

Regards
Takayuki Tsunakawa

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ajin Cherian 2021-02-03 01:28:33 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?
Previous Message Peter Smith 2021-02-03 01:08:07 Re: Single transaction in the tablesync worker?