| From: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | RE: How can end users know the cause of LR slot sync delays? |
| Date: | 2025-11-25 08:33:10 |
| Message-ID: | TY4PR01MB16907EF797D9B40A733982F6294D1A@TY4PR01MB16907.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tuesday, November 25, 2025 4:25 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2025 at 11:24 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 6:21 PM Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > The Cbot complained that it was not able to build the docs. I have
> > > fixed it and attached the latest patch.
> > >
> >
> > Few comments on 001:
> >
>
> Fixed these and other open comments on 0001 and pushed. But I see a BF
> failure [1]. I think it is due to the reason that the patch forgot to release the
> slot in one of the code paths.
Right, I agree. Here is the patch to release the slot at necessary places.
Best Regards,
Hou zj
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Fix-a-BF-failure-where-a-replication-slot-was-not.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | jian he | 2025-11-25 08:33:17 | Re: ON CONFLICT DO SELECT (take 3) |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2025-11-25 08:31:04 | Re: generic plans and "initial" pruning |