Re: Why ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name='none') requires subscription disabled?

From: Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name='none') requires subscription disabled?
Date: 2021-07-08 02:30:22
Message-ID: SYYP282MB1678B7024191E2FAC29F90B1B6199@SYYP282MB1678.AUSP282.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On Thu, 08 Jul 2021 at 01:32, Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>OTOH, when I execute ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SET (slot_name=''), it doesn't
> complain. However,
>>SELECT select pg_create_logical_replication_slot('', 'pgoutput') complains
> slot name is too
>>short. Although, the slot will be created at publisher, and validate the
> slot name, IMO, we
>>can also validate the slot_name in parse_subscription_options() to get the
> error early.
>>Attached fixes it. Any thoughts?
> I think that this fix is better after the check if the name is equal to
> "none".
> Most of the time it will be "none" .
> While this, reduce the overhead with strlen into
> ReplicationSlotValidateName can it might be worth it.
>
> For convenience, I have attached a new version.
>

Thanks for your review! LGTM.

--
Regrads,
Japin Li.
ChengDu WenWu Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2021-07-08 03:03:02 Re: Refactor "mutually exclusive options" error reporting code in parse_subscription_options
Previous Message David Rowley 2021-07-08 01:31:23 Re: [PATCH] expand the units that pg_size_pretty supports on output