From: | Nicola Palavecino <ninopalavecino(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Cc: | "pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Small typo in doc |
Date: | 2025-08-27 15:38:55 |
Message-ID: | SCYP152MB67141683D77C86B7958AF7C9CD38A@SCYP152MB6714.LAMP152.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Thank you! Yeah, it seems fine. Sorry for the inconvenience
Nicola
> El 27 ago 2025, a la(s) 08:24, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> escribió:
>
> On 27.08.25 04:49, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> The following documentation comment has been logged on the website:
>> Page: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/17/wal-async-commit.html
>> Description:
>> within this document
>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/wal-async-commit.html
>> in the paragraph that says:
>> "before the WAL records it generated have actually made their way to disk"
>> it should say
>> "before the WAL records generated have actually made their way to disk"
>> there's an "it" that shouldn't be there
>
> The full sentence is
>
> "Selecting asynchronous commit mode means that the server returns success as soon as the transaction is logically completed, before the WAL records it generated have actually made their way to disk."
>
> The "it" refers to "the server". Seem ok to me.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-08-31 23:20:04 | Re: Inaccurate statement about log shipping replication mode |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2025-08-27 14:27:34 | Re: Ambiguity in VALUES synopsis: LIMIT vs FETCH |