| From: | Marek PUBLICEWICZ <M(dot)Publicewicz(at)elka(dot)pw(dot)edu(dot)pl> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Strange results of CURRENT_TIMESTAMP |
| Date: | 2001-03-22 14:59:14 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.SOL.4.30.0103221553240.15623-100000@elektron.elka.pw.edu.pl |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > - fields defined as TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP sometimes generate
> > invalid format of the date, for instance:
> > 2001-02-10 13:11:60.00+01
>
> You are running the Mandrake RPMs? Or have otherwise compiled using the
> -ffast-math compiler flag?
>
I'm on the Mandrake but I'm using the compiled (from the sources) version
of PostgreSQL. As a matter of fact I dont't remember, wheter or not I put
the -ffast-math flag. Is this the reason for the inaccuracy?
If so - is it responsible also for the 'underflow' error?
Mark
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2001-03-22 15:06:31 | Re: Re: Call for platforms |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2001-03-22 14:56:06 | Re: pgindent run? |