From: | Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, eric(at)broken(dot)net, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres |
Date: | 1999-04-26 18:24:06 |
Message-ID: | Pine.SGI.3.95.990426112052.13754D-100000@bleu.west.spy.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 26 Apr 1999, Chris Bitmead wrote:
# > IDE is just plain slow on Unix. Unix does much better with SCSI,
# > especially when there are multiple disks.
#
# Oh I don't know. If you've only got 1 or 2 disks you may find IDE
# sufficient. (well it works nicely for me.)
Works != works as well as SCSI. I've yet to find an example where
IDE works as well as SCSI in real life (vs. benchmarks). My real life
scenarios rarely involve telling a machine to be still so we can do a disk
read, then again for a disk write.
# People have been commenting lately that postgres on Solaris is very slow
# compared to Linux. Apparently certain file system operations on Solaris
# is _slow_.
Slow, however more robust than the same in Linux. Linux achieves
a lot of speed by throwing away safety nets. Sometimes, these safety nets
are important.
--
SA, beyond.com My girlfriend asked me which one I like better.
pub 1024/3CAE01D5 1994/11/03 Dustin Sallings <dustin(at)spy(dot)net>
| Key fingerprint = 87 02 57 08 02 D0 DA D6 C8 0F 3E 65 51 98 D8 BE
L_______________________ I hope the answer won't upset her. ____________
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-04-26 18:47:05 | Re: [GENERAL] advice on buying sun hardware to run postgres |
Previous Message | Oseas Rodrigues | 1999-04-26 17:24:45 | Using postgresql with perl 5.0 |