| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, teramoto(dot)junji(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |
| Date: | 2006-07-24 19:48:03 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.OSF.4.61.0607242239230.422162@kosh.hut.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006, Tom Lane wrote:
> Personally I don't think retail vacuuming in that form will ever fly
> anyway, so I have no problem with installing the proposed patch,
> but I thought I'd better throw this comment out to see if anyone
> thinks it's a big deal.
My feeling is that retail vacuuming would be useful some day. But it's
certainly not going to be there in 8.2 so I have no objection with the
patch. It's a fairly localized change; it can easily be reverted later if
necessary.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2006-07-24 20:37:21 | Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation |
| Previous Message | Bort, Paul | 2006-07-24 19:25:56 | Re: Better name/syntax for "online" index creation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Lor | 2006-07-24 21:00:46 | Re: [PATCHES] Generic Monitoring Framework with DTrace patch |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-07-24 18:39:12 | Re: The vacuum-ignore-vacuum patch |