| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Bogus assertion in multixact.c? |
| Date: | 2005-05-03 18:55:15 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.OSF.4.61.0505032154120.347360@kosh.hut.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Never mind. multi is in effect a TransactionId in that code path, and thus
the assertion makes sense. Sorry for the noise.
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> There's an assertion in multixact.c, MultiXactIdExpand function, line 273:
>
> Assert(!TransactionIdEquals(multi, xid));
>
> where multi is a MultiXactId and xid is a TransactionId.
>
> Isn't this bogus? If I understand the code correctly, multixactids and
> regular xids live in completely separate id spaces. Therefore a comparison
> between them makes no sense.
>
> - Heikki
>
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-05-03 18:58:10 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-05-03 18:55:11 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |