From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Kurt Roeckx <Q(at)ping(dot)be> |
Cc: | Greg Copeland <greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net>, Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info>, PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
Date: | 2003-02-02 17:04:57 |
Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.51.0302030202440.509@angelic.cynic.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 02:35:15PM +0900, Curt Sampson wrote:
> >
> > Sure. But you still want to be able to say (and can say, in some [many?]
> > socket API implementations) that you want to accept only IPv4 or only IPv6
> > connections. I also want to be able to say the same thing in my database.
>
> You just create either an ipv4 or ipv6 socket.
Um...I'm talking about inserting data into a column in postgres. How do
I declare that a column can accept IPv4 addresses only?
And why will *nobody* address the question of whether this type should
include ISO/OSI addresses or not, and why?
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-02 17:49:34 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-02-02 14:18:05 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | cbbrowne | 2003-02-02 17:25:50 | Case Studio II |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2003-02-02 16:15:56 | Re: COUNT and Performance ... |