From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Curtis Faith <curtis(at)galtcapital(dot)com>, 'Justin Clift' <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |
Date: | 2003-02-01 06:06:29 |
Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.51.0302011459350.610@angelic.cynic.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Curtis Faith writes:
>
> > a) Running as a service is important as this the way NT/2000
> > administrators manage server tasks. The fact that PostgreSQL's Cygwin
> > emulation doesn't do this is very indicative of inferior Windows
> > support.
>
> No, it is indicative of the inability to read the documentation.
> PostgreSQL on Cygwin runs as a service if and only if you ask it to.
I would say that not supporting those who have an inability to read
documentation would count as "inferior Windows support." :-)
What I'm hearing here is that all we really need to do to "compete" with
MySQL on Windows is to make the UI a bit slicker. So what's the problem
with someone building, for each release, a set of appropriate binaries, and
someone making a slick install program that will install postgres,
install parts of cygwin if necessary, and set up postgres as a service?
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-02-01 06:11:28 | Re: On file locking |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2003-02-01 06:04:05 | Re: [mail] Re: Windows Build System |