| From: | Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Date: | 2003-01-31 01:58:48 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.4.51.0301311057390.5220@angelic.cynic.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't know anything
> about v6, but I'd imagine v4 addresses form a defined subset of the v6
> address space ...
No, they do not. The address spaces are completely independent. (There
is a "compatability space" for IPv4 addresses, but it turned out to be
impractical, and thus is generally not used. Certainly you cannot route
to arbitrary v4 hosts using a v6 address.)
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs(at)cynic(dot)net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Copeland | 2003-01-31 02:21:09 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-01-31 01:57:17 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Copeland | 2003-01-31 02:21:09 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |
| Previous Message | Curt Sampson | 2003-01-31 01:57:17 | Re: Linux.conf.au 2003 Report |