| From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, julie(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] PostODBC... |
| Date: | 1998-01-07 02:19:15 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.NEB.3.96.980106221816.254l-100000@thelab.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Thomas G. Lockhart wrote:
> I'm no expert, but (for example) RedHat distributes Linux as well as commercial
> products on the same CDROM. There are separate licensing statements for each
> category of software. It would seem to be the same issue with us; we aren't
> _forcing_ someone to use both categories...
Right, this I have no problems with...but, would that mean that we could
distribute it as PostODBC.tar.gz on the same CD as PostgreSQL-v6.3.tar.gz, or
as part of the overall tar file? Where does the line get drawn? :(
Marc G. Fournier
Systems Administrator @ hub.org
primary: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org secondary: scrappy(at){freebsd|postgresql}.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1998-01-07 02:19:16 | Re: [HACKERS] Tape files and MAXBLCKSZ vs. BLCKSZ |
| Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 1998-01-07 02:18:01 | Re: [HACKERS] Postgres acl (fwd) |