Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Brook Milligan <brook(at)trillium(dot)NMSU(dot)Edu>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] mega-patch--tcl/tk configuration
Date: 1998-03-23 16:49:19
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.3.95.980323114746.29709Q-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 23 Mar 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > This seems to defeat the purpose of the configure script. Isn't it
> > supposed to find whatever is needed, whereever it is, and let the rest
> > of the software do the right thing?
> >
> > In that case, it seems to me that configure should be checking all the
> > relevant version-specific locations without requiring any prompts.
> > After a few iterations, the list of appropriate directories will be
> > more-or-less all inclusive, so all will be well. The --use-tcl or
> > whatever config option can also give an explicit location in case the
> > current ones are not appropriate.
> >
> > But removing the other directories and requiring either a special
> > installation or response to a prompt seems to go against the nature
> > (and usefulness) of the configure system.
>
> It seems tcl/tk uses directory names with version numbers, and I have
> no intention of searching for every version they have ever released.

Why not? Or, rather, why not just do the ones that get reported
to us? It does hurt to, and I think it hurts more not too...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 1998-03-23 16:59:37 Re: [HACKERS] char types gone.
Previous Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-03-23 16:45:39 Re: PostgreSQL reference manual