Re: [HACKERS] Odd behavior of initdb

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Integration <abrams(at)philos(dot)umass(dot)edu>
Cc: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Odd behavior of initdb
Date: 1998-02-27 16:45:42
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.3.95.980227114511.18558G-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Integration wrote:

> Hi Everybody,
>
> Today I got the snapshot (2/27). I took it and put it on my little intel
> Linux box, RH5.0. I compiled the sucker with no problem. I installed it
> with no problem. The output of initdb --debug is as follows:
>
> (snip)
> <description text>
>
> > CREATED relation pg_description with OID 18791
> > Commit End
> Amopen: relation pg_description. attrsize 61
> create attribute 0 name objoid len 4 num 1 type 26
> create attribute 1 name description len -1 num 2 type 25
> > Amclose: relation (null).
> WARN:heap_modifytuple: repl is \ -9
> > initdb: could not create template database
>
> Does anyone know why this is? My source is undisturbed, except that I
> changed the max # of backends from 32 to 64 in the sinvaltid.h file in
> include/... as directed by the FAQ.

My experience with this one is that I had an older libpq floating
around...that was my problem on both FreeBSD and Solaris...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas G. Lockhart 1998-02-27 16:55:27 Re: [HACKERS] HISTORY list for 6.3
Previous Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 1998-02-27 16:32:53 Re: [HACKERS] Money type display