Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andreas(dot)Zeugswetter(at)telecom(dot)at, jwieck(at)debis(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Date: 1998-02-19 19:21:45
Message-ID: Pine.NEB.3.95.980219142114.17102Y-100000@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > Just curious, but why don't the copy command fall under the same
> > grant/revoke restrictions in the first place? It sounds to me like we are
> > backing off of the problem instead of addressing it...
>
> grant/revoke works for copy.

Ah, okay, so when we have it setup so that a view overrides the
'grant' of a select, then we're fine?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-19 19:26:03 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1998-02-19 19:13:30 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Solution to the pg_user passwd problem !?? (c)