Re: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof

Robert,

I don't see btree_gist with knn-support. I'm afraid it'll be forgotten.

Oleg
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Robert Haas wrote:

> With ten days left in the current CommitFest, being the last
> CommitFest for 9.1 development, there are presently 40 patches that
> are marked either Needs Review or Waiting on Author. The 11 patches
> that are Waiting on Author are the following:
>
> Synchronous Replication, transaction-controlled
> Recovery Control
> SQL/MED - postgresql_fdw
> FDW API
> Skip validation of Foreign Keys
> Self-tuning checkpoint sync spread
> PL/Python explicit subtransactions
> keeping timestamp of the lasts stats reset
> Named restore points
> pg_stat_activity.client_hostname field
> log_csv_fields ; add current_role log option
>
> If you are the author of one of these patches, you need to post an
> updated patch ASAP, or wait for 9.2. A number of these patches have
> been sitting for WEEKS without an update. When you post your updated
> patch (or if by chance you already did), please add a link to the
> CommitFest application and change the status to Needs Review. Many of
> these patches likely still need a few more rounds of review before
> they are committed. If you wait until February 14th at 11:59pm to
> update them, they're not going to make it in.
>
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/inprogress
>
> As for the patches that are marked Needs Review, some people have put
> their names into the CommitFest application, indicating their intent
> and commitment to review particular patches, and then have not done
> so. If you are one of those people, please post your review to the
> list and update the CommitFest application. If you are a reviewer who
> has completed all of the reviewing you've previously signed up for,
> and still want to do more, please consider jumping in on one of the
> patches that still needs review, and help move the discussion along.
> Even if you cannot do a full review, please review as much as you can
> and post your feedback to the list. We need to determine which of
> these patches are viable candidates for 9.2 and which are not. If you
> are a patch author and your patch is marked as needing review, please
> double-check that it still applies and has not bitrotted, and verify
> that you have responded to all feedback previously given, so that if
> someone has time to review your patch they can do so productively.
>
> Thanks,
>
>

Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83