Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand?

From: "Joshua(dot)Kramer" <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Hunter <hunteke(at)earlham(dot)edu>, ioguix <ioguix(at)free(dot)fr>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Postgres Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand?
Date: 2007-11-06 16:08:18
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0711061105190.10447@home-av-server.home-av (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
> The problem is we don't have the killer monkey app, e.g;
> We don't have SugarCRM (thank god, that code is horrendous).
> We don't have 100% Drupal support.

We do have vTiger, which is a fork of Sugar.  We also have PostBooks, 
which is of much higher quality (being based on around 800 Postgres 
Functions, and a Qt-based front-end for Linux, Windows, and Mac).

If I had time, I would write about bundling the Windows version of 
Postgres with Windows apps, instead of MS-SQL-Express.  That's what I did 
with PostBooks - I took the app and wrote a Windows installer for it. 
Such an article might be targeted at the Windows developer magazines and 


In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Greg Sabino MullaneDate: 2007-11-06 18:56:50
Subject: Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand?
Previous:From: Ned LillyDate: 2007-11-06 15:41:29
Subject: Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group