| From: | "Joshua(dot)Kramer" <josh(at)globalherald(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Kevin Hunter <hunteke(at)earlham(dot)edu>, ioguix <ioguix(at)free(dot)fr>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Postgres Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand? |
| Date: | 2007-11-06 16:08:18 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0711061105190.10447@home-av-server.home-av |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> The problem is we don't have the killer monkey app, e.g;
> We don't have SugarCRM (thank god, that code is horrendous).
> We don't have 100% Drupal support.
We do have vTiger, which is a fork of Sugar. We also have PostBooks,
which is of much higher quality (being based on around 800 Postgres
Functions, and a Qt-based front-end for Linux, Windows, and Mac).
If I had time, I would write about bundling the Windows version of
Postgres with Windows apps, instead of MS-SQL-Express. That's what I did
with PostBooks - I took the app and wrote a Windows installer for it.
Such an article might be targeted at the Windows developer magazines and
websites...
Cheers,
-JK
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2007-11-06 18:56:50 | Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand? |
| Previous Message | Ned Lilly | 2007-11-06 15:41:29 | Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand? |