| From: | "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong |
| Date: | 2007-09-11 17:06:16 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0709112054270.9144@lnfm1.sai.msu.ru |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> NOTICE: database "contrib_regression" does not exist, skipping
>> ERROR: too many active hash_seq_search scans
>> ERROR: too many active hash_seq_search scans
>> ERROR: too many active hash_seq_search scans
>> ERROR: too many active hash_seq_search scans
With hash_seq_search ERROR, it was partially a false alarm. I've had some
old postgres daemon hanging around and writing that to the log.
Although I remember seeing that hash_seq_search message recently when
dealing with this bug, it does not show up in the course of standard
regression tests.
regards,
Sergey
*******************************************************************
Sergey E. Koposov
Max Planck Institute for Astronomy/Cambridge Institute for Astronomy/Sternberg Astronomical Institute
Tel: +49-6221-528-349
Web: http://lnfm1.sai.msu.ru/~math
E-mail: math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-11 17:06:47 | Re: Per-function search_path => per-function GUC settings |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-09-11 16:57:31 | Re: What is happening on buildfarm member dugong |