| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Eddie Stanley <eddiewould(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, mux(at)elvis(dot)mu(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Frustrating issue with PGXS |
| Date: | 2007-06-27 07:53:40 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0706270943390.8639@briare.cri.ensmp.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> It might be worth backpatching the Makefile.global.in patch (ie, the
> ifndef addition) to the 8.2 branch, which would allow us to say "8.2.5
> or later" instead of "8.3 or later", and would bring correspondingly
> nearer the time when people can actually use the feature without
> thinking much. Comments?
My 2 euro cents (about $0.027) conservative comments on the subject:
- It is more work for a minor issue. I would just update the doc for
previous releases.
- New features belong to new releases, on principles. It is not really a
bug which would require an update of previous releases, and changing the
PATH is a valid workaround anyway.
- Do it your way:-)
--
Fabien.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavan Deolasee | 2007-06-27 08:06:54 | Re: HOT: Incomplete issues |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-06-27 07:21:04 | Re: Bgwriter LRU cleaning: we've been going at this all wrong |