From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Array indexes, GIN? |
Date: | 2007-03-02 06:45:03 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0703020942310.400@sn.sai.msu.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Adam,
>
>> On the surface, looks like a job for GIN, but GIN seems undocumented,
>> specifically mentions it doesn't support the deletes we'll have many of
>> since it's designed for word searching apparently, the performance
>> implications are undocumented. I searched, I read, and even IRC'd, and
>> it seems like GIN is just not used much.
>
> It's new (as of 8.2). And the authors, Oleg and Teodor, are notorious for
> skimpy documetentation.
We're getting better, we have 72 pages written about new FTS :)
>
> I'd start with the code in INTARRAY contrib module (also by Teodor) and bug
> them on pgsql-hackers about helping you implement a GIN index for arrays.
GIN already has support for one dimensional arrays and intarray, particularly,
too has support of GiN.
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | hytech.qa | 2007-03-02 06:46:31 | Hibernate left join |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-03-02 05:48:08 | Re: Improving query performance |