From: | Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> |
Subject: | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch'sconfiguration |
Date: | 2006-11-18 18:47:53 |
Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.64.0611182140320.9946@sn.sai.msu.ru |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>>> So, if we'll not touch grammar, are there any issues with tsearch2 in
>>> core ?
>>
>> Are there any issues with tsearch2 not in core?
>>
>
>
> Quite apart from anything else, it really needs documentation of the
> standard we give other core features.
Sure. I just learned how to built (successfully) pg documentation and
researching on what's documentation standard. Should we need to write
separate full text search chapter and/or add description to relevant
chapters.
>
> I think if a feature will be of sufficiently general use it should be a
> candidate for inclusion, and text search certainly comes within that
> category in my mind.
It could helps us in Pg-MySQL discussions, at least, since we beat
mysql's fts :)
Regards,
Oleg
_____________________________________________________________
Oleg Bartunov, Research Scientist, Head of AstroNet (www.astronet.ru)
Sternberg Astronomical Institute, Moscow University, Russia
Internet: oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su, http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/
phone: +007(495)939-16-83, +007(495)939-23-83
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rodrigo Hjort | 2006-11-18 19:34:50 | Ontology on PostgreSQL - is there something? |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-11-18 18:37:50 | Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with |