Re: Replication on the backend

From: "Aly S(dot)P Dharshi" <aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Replication on the backend
Date: 2005-12-06 21:37:44
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0512061436490.18812@edtnas67.telus.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I would classify it as a clustered database system (Oracle 10g that is).
Clustered meaning more than one node in the cluster.

ALy.

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005, Michael Meskes wrote:

>> Postgres-R, pgcluster, Slony-II. Some more advanced, some less. But
>> certainly nothing I would send into the ring against Oracle-Grid.
>
>Assuming that you mean Oracle Real Application Cluster (the Grid is more,
>right?) I wonder if this technology technically still counts as replication.
>AFAIK they do not replicate data but share a common data pool among different
>servers. You still have communication overhead but you write a tuple only
>once for all servers involved. Takes away a lot of overhead on a system
>that's heavily written too.
>
>Michael
>

--
Aly S.P Dharshi
aly(dot)dharshi(at)telus(dot)net

"A good speech is like a good dress
that's short enough to be interesting
and long enough to cover the subject"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-12-06 22:07:17 Re: more locale problems on Windows
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2005-12-06 21:33:54 Re: more locale problems on Windows