Re: Rebranding PostgreSQL

From: Ben <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>
To: john(dot)bender(at)hushmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rebranding PostgreSQL
Date: 2005-11-16 18:28:40
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.0511161023500.16744@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Education is the best way to go. How are you going to slide in postgres? "Hey
guys, we can get rid of all your diverse databases and replace them with this
black box I found here." Sooner or later your anti-OSS friends are going to find
out you tricked them, and what happens then?

If your clients have serious concerns with open source, address them. If they
don't, call them on it. If they're in charge (and clients often are) and they
insist on paying money for inferior software, show them what it will really cost
them. If they still want to pay - hey, it's not your money that's being wasted.

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, john(dot)bender(at)hushmail(dot)com wrote:

> So, is it a little shady to want to slide PostgreSQL in under the
> radar? I'm simply trying to downplay what it is...it's my take that
> what they don't know won't hurt them.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-11-16 18:41:31 Re: locked backend
Previous Message Murdia, Swati -Gil 2005-11-16 18:27:36 PostgreSQL compatible with Real Time Linux ?