Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RPMs are available for download

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Pavel Stehule <stehule(at)kix(dot)fsv(dot)cvut(dot)cz>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.1.0 RPMs are available for download
Date: 2005-11-10 08:09:05
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.63.0511101008340.24785@mail.kivi.com.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Pavel Stehule wrote:

> will be packages for debian?

I think there are already:

http://people.debian.org/~mpitt/

Regards,
- --
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDcwAm4zE8DGqpiZARAjzmAKCPRxayiFq8NaV+AbVLJeYhzydThgCcDow8
HJOY8bnfdbXbFgMb1CpKGFI=
=/aHt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>From pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Thu Nov 10 04:12:16 2005
X-Original-To: pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D344D9378
for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:12:15 -0400 (AST)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 15378-01
for <pgsql-general-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>;
Thu, 10 Nov 2005 08:12:13 +0000 (GMT)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4FED907F
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 04:12:12 -0400 (AST)
Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
id 1Ea7WP-0004lK-Dr
for pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:11:01 +0100
Received: from 81.24.138.20 ([81.24.138.20])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:11:01 +0100
Received: from nvasiliev by 81.24.138.20 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 10 Nov 2005 09:11:01 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
From: Nicolay A Vasiliev <nvasiliev(at)whiteriversoft(dot)com>
Subject: Dynamic web sites with PostgreSQL
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 10:50:34 +0300
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <dkuu4b$6k8$1(at)sea(dot)gmane(dot)org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet(at)sea(dot)gmane(dot)org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.24.138.20
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, ru
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.253 required=5 tests=[RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253]
X-Spam-Score: 1.253
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Archive-Number: 200511/521
X-Sequence-Number: 86665

Hello there!

I'd like to ask the PostgreSQL community for the conseptual thing. We
develop our web sites using MySQL. We like this for its high speed and
fulltext search feature. But nowadays our projects are growing fast and
we afraid our MySQL won't be able to perform large amount of complex
complicated queries. So we get a question about altenative SQL server.
In fact there are not too much from open source SQL servers, I think
only 2 serious: PostgreSQL and MaxDB. May I sak you about words for
advocacy or accusation for each of these database servers?

Our tasks: static content generation but using of complicated search
feature on the web site.

Any suggestions are very appreciated.

Thanks in advance and kind regards,
Nicolay Vasiliev

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message surabhi.ahuja 2005-11-10 08:27:53 Re: Postmaster failing to start on reboot
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2005-11-10 02:38:20 Re: TRUNCATE Question