Re: Slony RPM issue

From: Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>
To: Philip Yarra <philip(at)utiba(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, slony1-general(at)gborg(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slony RPM issue
Date: 2005-10-06 06:16:10
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.63.0510060842430.6525@mail.kivi.com.tr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Hi,

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Philip Yarra wrote:

> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:32 am, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>> Thanks for the report. It will fixed in CVS and all the RPM sets later
>> today. Always feel free to send me a patch if you want, I can apply your
>> patch, too.
>
> OK, you got my previous email about why pgsql-libs was dependent on
> compat-libs RPM?

See:
http://people.planetpostgresql.org/devrim/index.php?/archives/15-New-PostgreSQL-point-releases.html

"New" 8.0.4 RPMs will solve that problem.

Cheers,
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
Kivi Bilişim Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org
>From pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Thu Oct 6 03:42:57 2005
X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97037DA30C
for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 03:42:56 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 16238-04
for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>;
Thu, 6 Oct 2005 06:42:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from smtp1.iitb.ac.in (unknown [203.199.81.149])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82A07DA2FB
for <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 03:42:50 -0300 (ADT)
Received: (qmail 12115 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2005 12:12:49 +0530
Received: from unknown (HELO ldns2.iitb.ac.in) (10.200.12.2)
by smtp1.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 6 Oct 2005 12:12:49 +0530
Received: (qmail 13270 invoked by uid 509); 6 Oct 2005 06:42:49 -0000
Received: from 10.129.1.1 by ldns2 (envelope-from <sandeep(at)it(dot)iitb(dot)ac(dot)in>, uid 501) with qmail-scanner-1.25st
(clamdscan: 0.87/1110. spamassassin: 3.1.0.
Clear:RC:1(10.129.1.1):.
Processed in 0.016821 secs); 06 Oct 2005 06:42:49 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO imap.it.iitb.ac.in) (10.129.1.1)
by ldns2.iitb.ac.in with SMTP; 6 Oct 2005 06:42:49 -0000
Received: from akash (akash.it.iitb.ac.in [::ffff:10.129.1.2])
by imap.it.iitb.ac.in with esmtp; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:08:17 +0530
id 0000172D.4344C659.000038FC
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
(IDENT: uid 205035)
by akash with esmtp; Thu, 06 Oct 2005 12:08:08 +0530
id 00001147.4344C650.00007FE1
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:08:08 +0530 (IST)
From: sandeep satpal <sandeep(at)it(dot)iitb(dot)ac(dot)in>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Query Regarding initdb
In-Reply-To: <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)63(dot)0510060842430(dot)6525(at)mail(dot)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr>
Message-ID: <Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)63(dot)0510061206190(dot)16181(at)akash(dot)it(dot)iitb(dot)ac(dot)in>
References: <200510051751(dot)13573(dot)philip(at)utiba(dot)com>
<Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)63(dot)0510051107100(dot)23458(at)mail(dot)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr> <200510061059(dot)27362(dot)philip(at)utiba(dot)com>
<Pine(dot)LNX(dot)4(dot)63(dot)0510060842430(dot)6525(at)mail(dot)kivi(dot)com(dot)tr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.312 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.062,
DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.374]
X-Spam-Level:
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-Archive-Number: 200510/254
X-Sequence-Number: 74113

Hello all,

I want to set a system level flag for my own purposes.
What changes in initdb.c or any other files are expected.
And When I will run my postgresql , how I get that system level flag.

On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:

>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Philip Yarra wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 6 Oct 2005 12:32 am, Devrim GUNDUZ wrote:
>>> Thanks for the report. It will fixed in CVS and all the RPM sets later
>>> today. Always feel free to send me a patch if you want, I can apply your
>>> patch, too.
>>
>> OK, you got my previous email about why pgsql-libs was dependent on
>> compat-libs RPM?
>
> See:
> http://people.planetpostgresql.org/devrim/index.php?/archives/15-New-PostgreSQL-point-releases.html
>
> "New" 8.0.4 RPMs will solve that problem.
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Devrim GUNDUZ
> Kivi Bili?im Teknolojileri - http://www.kivi.com.tr
> devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
> http://www.gunduz.org
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>

--
------------------
| Sandeep Satpal |
| M.Tech Student |
| Lab 212 KReSIT |
------------------
>From pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org Thu Oct 6 04:44:02 2005
X-Original-To: pgsql-hackers-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Received: from localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41A0DA2F9
for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 04:43:51 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from svr1.postgresql.org ([200.46.204.71])
by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 23452-01
for <pgsql-hackers-postgresql(dot)org(at)localhost(dot)postgresql(dot)org>;
Thu, 6 Oct 2005 07:43:44 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from hotmail.com (bay20-f17.bay20.hotmail.com [64.4.54.106])
by svr1.postgresql.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B954BD8833
for <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>; Thu, 6 Oct 2005 04:43:44 -0300 (ADT)
Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
Thu, 6 Oct 2005 00:43:46 -0700
Message-ID: <BAY20-F177DFE8FB76659ECBFB540F9850(at)phx(dot)gbl>
Received: from 85.160.84.164 by by20fd.bay20.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;
Thu, 06 Oct 2005 07:43:46 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [85.160.84.164]
X-Originating-Email: [pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com]
X-Sender: pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com
In-Reply-To: <20051005133251(dot)GJ5239(at)surnet(dot)cl>
From: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)hotmail(dot)com>
To: alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: current_user versus current_role SOLVED
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 09:43:46 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Oct 2005 07:43:46.0876 (UTC) FILETIME=[AF154FC0:01C5CA49]
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.312 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.438,
DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.374, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.376, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0]
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Archive-Number: 200510/255
X-Sequence-Number: 74114

>
>Hi,
>
> > I used info from current_user for log. about some operations (who, when,
> > ..). What I can see, current_user is equal current_role function. I had
> > problem with it, because user (if is member of any group role) can
>change
> > his identity. example: peter is member of role users. But peter can do
>set
> > role to users. From this moment I lost possibility of get identity if
>user,
> > because current_user returns users and not peter. I can check it (if
>some
> > user changed identity) ~ by exampl. test if role has login privilegia,
>and
> > if not I can stop any operations.
>
>I believe you can use session_user for this.
>
>--
it's exactly it what I want.

Thank You
Pavel Stehule

_________________________________________________________________
Najdete si svou lasku a nove pratele na Match.com. http://www.msn.cz/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2005-10-06 07:53:25 Re: prefix btree implementation
Previous Message Neil Conway 2005-10-06 05:32:32 Re: fixing LISTEN/NOTIFY