| From: | Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | RBuchholz(at)Chamberlain(dot)com |
| Cc: | pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: RHEL3.0 Support for pgadmin |
| Date: | 2005-05-09 23:15:08 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.61.0505100214130.18255@emo.org.tr |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgadmin-support |
Hi,
On Mon, 9 May 2005 RBuchholz(at)Chamberlain(dot)com wrote:
> In the downloads section for pgadmin3 (v1.2.0), I see binary versions for
> RH9 and Fedora Cores 1 and 3, but no RHEL3.0 version.
>
> I scanned the userslist archive and saw that the recommendations were to
> use the RH9 binaries and not the RH Fedora Core versions for RHEL sites.
>
> In a thread from 28-Dec-2004, Devrim made mention that he could maybe do
> a build for RHEL3.0 binaries in Jan, but did not have all of the libraries
> installed.
>
> Q1: Is a RHEL3.0 build still being considered?
Yes, I now have a box that I can build RHEL3 RPMs.
> Q2: Has there been any feedback from those on RHEL3.0 systems as to the
> functionality of the RH9 version, i.e., is this working out ok?
I'd try rebuilding the SRPM... It will work.
--
Devrim GUNDUZ
devrim~gunduz.org, devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.tdmsoft.com.tr http://www.gunduz.org
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gino Lucrezi | 2005-05-10 11:17:09 | pgAdmin 1.2.1 doesn't display comments on constraints |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2005-05-09 21:47:30 | Re: Privilege info is missing |