| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Using ALTER TABLESPACE in pg_dump |
| Date: | 2004-10-26 06:24:04 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.61.0410260817240.26921@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dear Tom,
>> ISTM that the core business of a database is to help organize and protect
>> data, and it is plainly that. You just wish you won't need it, so it is
>> somehow "abstract", but when and if you need it, it is not "second-order"
>> at all;-) and it is much too late to redo the dump.
>
> So you create some tablespaces by hand. Big deal.
I agree that is is doable this way, although not really nice.
> This objection is not strong enough to justify an ugly, klugy definition
> for where tables get created.
I do also agree about this.
My real point is that while reading the thread quickly, I was afraid the
problem would not be better addressed at all in the coming release.
It seems that I was wrong as it does not look to be the case.
Any fix instead of nothing is fair enough for me.
Thanks for your answer, have a nice day,
--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2004-10-26 08:49:15 | Re: [PATCHES] ARC Memory Usage analysis |
| Previous Message | Adrian Maier | 2004-10-26 06:13:54 | Re: [HACKERS] Question on the 8.0Beta Version |