Re: pg_regress --temp-keep

From: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_regress --temp-keep
Date: 2004-10-20 11:57:52
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.61.0410201354520.15977@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches


Dear Peter,

>> Thus the only performance improvement I can see is to change the
>> "install" script, for instance by considering the multi-argument
>> apache version as a candidate replacement.
>
> You can always override the default to use your own install program if
> you are really pressed for performance. (make install INSTALL=install
> or similar)

That simple idea alone seems to give a 25% cpu performance gain on my
laptop for a "make check"...

I'll try to find time to test the multi-arg install for further
improvements anyway.

Thanks!

--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-10-20 14:38:25 Re: Possible make_oidjoins_check Security Issue
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2004-10-20 11:54:27 Re: Possible make_oidjoins_check Security Issue