Re: Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)alcove(dot)com(dot)au>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback
Date: 2007-03-20 22:36:55
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0703210936240.1734@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> Hackers et al... I was wondering if there are any outstanding issues
> that need to be resolved in terms of the clustered index/bitmap changes?
>
> >From the testing that I have done, plus a couple of others it is a net
> win (at least from DBA space).

Not sure if you're talking about bitmap indexes here. If so, I'm working
on VACUUM support.

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-20 22:57:53 Re: Bug in CREATE/DROP TABLESPACE command
Previous Message Chris Travers 2007-03-20 22:11:43 Question about the TODO, numerics, and division

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-03-20 23:03:24 Re: Bitmapscan changes - Requesting further feedback
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-20 21:31:09 Re: Code-Cleanup: char* -> const char*