| From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Mikael Carneholm <Mikael(dot)Carneholm(at)WirelessCar(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Luke Lonergan <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: This is our slashdot coverage? |
| Date: | 2006-12-08 02:46:21 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0612081345040.29385@linuxworld.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Thu, 7 Dec 2006, Mikael Carneholm wrote:
> >
> > And we're building the windowing functions as fast as we can ;-)
> >
>
> Interesting. Which functions are you planning on implementing, more
> specifically? (Personally, I have had great use of FIRST/LAST,
> RANK/DENSE_RANK and LAG/LEAD)
Interestingly, FIRST, LAST, LAG and LEAD are absent from the spec but
everyone I've spoken to has said they're close to being the most useful
:-). So, I'm aiming to do those as well.
Implemenenting the actual functions is trivial compared to implementing
the window construct in the executor (and planner).
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2006-12-08 03:38:58 | Re: This is our slashdot coverage? |
| Previous Message | Ron Mayer | 2006-12-08 02:40:59 | Re: This is our slashdot coverage? |