| From: | Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter(dot)Brant(at)wicourts(dot)gov |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation |
| Date: | 2006-05-11 01:38:00 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0605102134540.14978@eon.cs |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On Sun, 7 May 2006, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > Leave 'em alone. That code has zero field validation, and should
> > certainly not get shipped until it's survived a beta-test cycle.
>
> Uh, this is a bug fix, and the patch I am asking about is not the Win32
> semaphore reimplementation but a more limited fix.
Sorry for the late reply. Maybe more intensive tests are needed? Since
this bug seems could not lead data corruption, we can wait till next bug
report and let the user test it then decide to apply?
Regards,
Qingqing
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-11 01:50:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-11 01:34:38 | Re: .pgpass file and unix domain sockets |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-05-11 01:50:10 | Re: [HACKERS] Question on win32 semaphore simulation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-11 01:24:11 | Re: BEGIN inside transaction should be an error |