| From: | Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Qingqing Zhou <zhouqq(at)cs(dot)toronto(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ice-broker scan thread |
| Date: | 2005-11-29 04:38:39 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0511291524470.18419@linuxworld.com.au |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
> Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> > I haven't had time to prototype whether we can easily implement async IO
>
> Just as with any suggestion to depend on threads, you are going to have
> to show results that border on astounding to have any chance of getting
> this in. Otherwise the portability issues are just going to make it not
> worth the trouble.
The architecture I am looking at would not rely on threads.
I didn't want to jump on list and waive my hands until I had something to
show, but since Qingqing is looking at the issue I thought I better raise
it.
Gavin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mark Kirkwood | 2005-11-29 04:45:17 | Re: ice-broker scan thread |
| Previous Message | David Boreham | 2005-11-29 04:34:26 | Re: ice-broker scan thread |