Re: best analysis of Oracle-Innobase I've seen

From:	Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To:	Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
Cc:	PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject:	Re: best analysis of Oracle-Innobase I've seen
Date:	2005-10-25 22:21:48
Message-ID:	Pine.LNX.4.58.0510260821130.12074@linuxworld.com.au
Views:	Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:	2005-10-25 17:34:35 from Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>  2005-10-25 18:00:53 from Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>   2005-10-25 19:00:01 from Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>    2005-10-25 21:28:16 from Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>     2005-10-25 22:20:44 from Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>  2005-10-25 20:05:38 from "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>  2005-10-25 22:21:48 from Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
Lists:	pgsql-advocacy

In response to

• best analysis of Oracle-Innobase I've seen at 2005-10-25 17:34:35 from Ned Lilly

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Jim C. Nasby	2005-10-25 22:55:28	ROI/TCO for PostgreSQL
Previous Message	Chris Browne	2005-10-25 22:20:44	Re: best analysis of Oracle-Innobase I've seen