Re: WAL/PITR additional items

From: Gavin Sherry <swm(at)linuxworld(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WAL/PITR additional items
Date: 2005-04-20 23:34:41
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0504210932290.27355@linuxworld.com.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Tom Lane wrote:

> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > 2. PreallocXlogFiles to run from a separate process to make it
> > effective, as discussed last year.
>
> What?

The discussion Simon is refering to came up during the 8.0 beta IIRC. The
problem was that we were not allocating xlogs quickly enough under
heavy workloads and there was some discussion about the bgwriter taking
over this task since it could assess the need for new xlogs more often.

Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-04-20 23:41:28 Re: WAL/PITR additional items
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-20 23:33:54 Re: Proposal for background vacuum full/cluster