| From: | Ron Mayer <ron(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] A way to let Vacuum warn if FSM settings are low. |
| Date: | 2005-02-24 22:43:45 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0502241441230.13185@greenie.cheapcomplexdevices.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-patches |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Should the relation overflow be a WARNING or a LOG? It sounds like
> if you have that problem it's almost certainly a problem, right?
And while I'm at it... what's the convention for INFOs vs LOGs?
The "checkpoint...too frequent" seemed similar, and is a LOG.
And do people think the HINT's I added add value or just noise?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rick Casey | 2005-02-24 22:50:47 | Re: basic trigger using OLD not working? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-24 22:42:13 | Re: [PATCHES] A way to let Vacuum warn if FSM settings are low. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Eric Crampton | 2005-02-24 22:49:00 | Patch for Postmaster Uptime (from the TODO) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-02-24 22:42:13 | Re: [PATCHES] A way to let Vacuum warn if FSM settings are low. |