| From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures |
| Date: | 2004-06-10 09:07:16 |
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.58.0406101100130.23525@sablons.cri.ensmp.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Dear Bruce,
> > So maybe the following TODO could be kept:
> > - validate grant/revoke (error, warning, success0 wrt sql standard
> >
> > I may be interested in implementing ROLEs someday, and such tests would be
> > welcome just to check that nothing is broken.
>
> Unless someone can say it is wrong I am not inclinded to add a TODO item
> that is only possible.
Sorry, I do not understand your argument, what you mean by "only
possible". Or are you talking about roles??
I see TODO items as wishes, and I'm not sure I can see what is wrong with
wishing better/full testing of postgresql data access controls and compare
the results with what is defined by the norm?
--
Fabien Coelho - coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2004-06-10 12:09:58 | Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures |
| Previous Message | Martino Serri | 2004-06-10 08:06:44 | PostgreSQL does not have native spinlock support on this platform |