Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: BUG #1145: silent REVOKE failures
Date: 2004-06-09 17:40:13
Message-ID: 200406091740.i59HeDA08234@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> > >> For the TODO, I would suggest something general:
> > >> - fix grant/revoke wrt SQL standard, validate errors, warnings and successes.
> >
> > > Tom, is this done?
> >
> > I think so. At least, we're a lot closer to spec than we were.
>
> Indeed.
>
> Maybe the validation part could be improved somehow, with test cases
> build from the sql specification and the expected behavior checked
> against the actual behavior.
>
> What I derived from the many discussion and time I spent on the standard
> is that there is a lot of subtlety involved.
>
> So maybe the following TODO could be kept:
>
> - validate grant/revoke (error, warning, success0 wrt sql standard
>
> I may be interested in implementing ROLEs someday, and such tests would be
> welcome just to check that nothing is broken.

Unless someone can say it is wrong I am not inclinded to add a TODO item
that is only possible.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Don Zola 2004-06-09 19:04:34 7.4.2 initdb core dumping on solaris 2.8
Previous Message Crispin Miller 2004-06-09 16:36:35 Identifying cause of "database system shutdown was interrupted" at failed startup