Re: Further thoughts about warning for costly FK checks

From: Jon Jensen <jon(at)endpoint(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Further thoughts about warning for costly FK checks
Date: 2004-03-18 17:05:12
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.58.0403181703360.3654@louche.swelter.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Richard Huxton wrote:

> On Thursday 18 March 2004 10:18, Fabien COELHO wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> > > though I'd be worried about the portability price paid to have one. Or
> > > are you concerned about whether a GUI could invoke it? I don't see why
> > > not --- the GUIs don't reimplement pg_dump, do they?
>
> Actually Tom, I think they do (where they have an export facility). How would
> you run pg_dump on a remote machine? (well, without building an RPC
> mechanism)

Can't the GUI just do "pg_dump -h remotehost ..."? Or do you mean
something else? I think the phpPgAdmin developers recommend using pg_dump
exactly because they don't want to reinvent that formidable wheel.

Jon

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-18 17:34:36 Re: [HACKERS] fsync method checking
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2004-03-18 16:52:21 Re: COPY formatting