| From: | Wei Weng <wweng(at)kencast(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "John B(dot) Scalia" <jscalia(at)cityblueprinting(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Bug in psql - Postgresql 7.3.1? | 
| Date: | 2003-10-03 19:37:33 | 
| Message-ID: | Pine.LNX.4.56.0310031536520.6639@localhost.localdomain | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-sql | 
Shouldn't that be "UPDATE my_table SET field1 = 'new_value', field2 = 
'different_value' WHERE my_table_id = 'key';"?
Wei
On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, John B. Scalia wrote:
> All,
> 
>  
> 
> I'm not certain if what I'm trying to do is legal, but if I execute a
> statement like:
> 
>  
> 
> UPDATE my_table SET field1='new_value' AND SET field2='different_value'
> WHERE my_table_id = 'key';
> 
>  
> 
> in psql, it reports that it has successfully updated one record.
> However, the record does not appear to be updated when I subsequently
> issue a SELECT for that record. I'll buy the fact that I may be using
> illegal syntax - I'm not SQL expert, but the update says it worked when
> in fact it did not. Should this have worked or should it have reported
> an error?
> 
>  
> 
> For record, this is Postgresql 7.3.1 on Solaris 9. Problem originally
> seen during a php4 script, but has been duplicated on the psql command
> line.
> 
>  
> 
> TIA,
> 
> John
> 
> 
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-10-03 19:44:53 | Re: Data type conversion | 
| Previous Message | Jeff Boes | 2003-10-03 16:20:59 | Re: Data type conversion |