Re: Bug in psql - Postgresql 7.3.1?

From: Wei Weng <wweng(at)kencast(dot)com>
To: "John B(dot) Scalia" <jscalia(at)cityblueprinting(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug in psql - Postgresql 7.3.1?
Date: 2003-10-03 19:37:33
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.56.0310031536520.6639@localhost.localdomain
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Shouldn't that be "UPDATE my_table SET field1 = 'new_value', field2 =
'different_value' WHERE my_table_id = 'key';"?

Wei

On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, John B. Scalia wrote:

> All,
>
>
>
> I'm not certain if what I'm trying to do is legal, but if I execute a
> statement like:
>
>
>
> UPDATE my_table SET field1='new_value' AND SET field2='different_value'
> WHERE my_table_id = 'key';
>
>
>
> in psql, it reports that it has successfully updated one record.
> However, the record does not appear to be updated when I subsequently
> issue a SELECT for that record. I'll buy the fact that I may be using
> illegal syntax - I'm not SQL expert, but the update says it worked when
> in fact it did not. Should this have worked or should it have reported
> an error?
>
>
>
> For record, this is Postgresql 7.3.1 on Solaris 9. Problem originally
> seen during a php4 script, but has been duplicated on the psql command
> line.
>
>
>
> TIA,
>
> John
>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2003-10-03 19:44:53 Re: Data type conversion
Previous Message Jeff Boes 2003-10-03 16:20:59 Re: Data type conversion